
Apr 28, · Capital punishment. This article is more than 7 years old. US death row study: 4% of defendants sentenced to die are innocent. This article is more than 7 years old Capital Punishment in the United States. While most of the free world has abolished the death penalty, many of the states within the U.S. continue to use capital punishment in their criminal justice systems. In , the United States Supreme Court suspended the imposition of the death penalty, finding it unconstitutional because it was imposed The death penalty in America is a broken process from start to finish. Death sentences are predicted not by the heinousness of the crime but by the poor quality of the defense lawyers, the race of the accused or the victim, and the county and state in which the crime occurred. From to , 1, executions occurred in the United States, and of them took place in the South. Time and
Capital Punishment | American Civil Liberties Union
Capital punishmentalso known as the death penaltyis the state -sanctioned killing of a person as punishment for a crime. The sentence ordering that someone is punished with the death penalty is called a death sentenceand the act of carrying out such a sentence is known as an execution. A prisoner awaiting their execution is condemned and is "on death row ".
Crimes that are punishable by death are known as capital crimescapital offences or capital feloniesand vary depending on the jurisdiction, but commonly include serious crimes against the person such as murdermass murderaggravated cases of rapechild rapechild sexual abuseterrorismaircraft hijackingwar crimescrimes against humanityand genocidealong with crimes against the state such as attempting to overthrow government, treasonespionageseditionand piracy.
Also, in some cases, acts of recidivismaggravated robberyand kidnappingin addition to drug traffickingdrug dealingand drug possessionare capital crimes or enhancements. Etymologically, the term capital lit. Fifty-four countries retain capital punishmentcountries have completely abolished it de jure for all crimes, seven have abolished it for ordinary crimes while maintaining it for special circumstances such as war crimesand 27 are abolitionist in practice.
Capital punishment is controversial in several countries and states, and positions can vary within a single political ideology or cultural region. In the European Union EUArticle 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union prohibits the use of capital punishment. However, this only affects those member states which capital punishment essay against signed and ratified it, and they do not include ArmeniaRussiacapital punishment essay against, and Azerbaijan.
The United Nations General Assembly has adopted, throughout the years from to[10] eight non-binding resolutions calling for a global moratorium on executionswith a view to eventual abolition.
Execution of criminals and dissidents has been used by nearly all societies since the beginning of civilizations on Earth. Other methods which appear only in legend include the blood eagle and brazen bull. The use of formal execution extends to the beginning of recorded history.
Most historical records and various primitive tribal practices indicate that the death penalty was a part of their justice system, capital punishment essay against. Communal punishments for wrongdoing generally included blood money compensation by the wrongdoer, corporal punishmentshunningbanishment and execution. In tribal societies, compensation and shunning were often considered enough as a form of justice.
A blood feud or vendetta occurs when arbitration between families or tribes fails or an arbitration system is non-existent. This form of justice was common before the emergence of an arbitration system based on state or organized religion.
It may result from crime, capital punishment essay against, land disputes or a code of honour. In most countries that practise capital punishment, it is now reserved for murderterrorismwar crimesespionagetreasonor as part of military justice.
In some countries sexual crimessuch as rapecapital punishment essay against, fornicationadulteryincestsodomycapital punishment essay against, and bestiality carry the death penalty, as do religious crimes such as HududZinaand Qisas crimes, such as apostasy formal renunciation of the state religionblasphemymoharebehhirabahFasadcapital punishment essay against, Mofsed-e-filarz and witchcraft.
In many countries that use the death penaltydrug trafficking and often drug possession is also a capital offence, capital punishment essay against. In China, capital punishment essay against trafficking and serious cases of corruption and financial crimes are punished by the death penalty.
In militaries around the world courts-martial have imposed death sentences for offences such as cowardicedesertioninsubordinationand mutiny. Elaborations of tribal arbitration of feuds included peace settlements often done in a religious context and compensation system. Compensation was based on the principle of substitution which might include material for example, cattle, slaves, land compensation, exchange of brides or grooms, or payment of the blood debt. Settlement rules could allow for animal blood to replace human blood, or transfers of property or blood money or in some case an offer of a person for execution.
The person offered for execution did not have to be an original perpetrator of the crime because the social system was based on tribes and clans, not individuals. Blood feuds could be regulated at meetings, capital punishment essay against, such as the Norsemen things. One of the more modern refinements of the blood feud is the duel. In certain parts of the world, nations in the form of ancient republics, monarchies or tribal oligarchies emerged.
These nations were often united by common linguistic, religious or family ties. Moreover, expansion of these nations often occurred by conquest of neighbouring tribes or nations. Consequently, various classes of royalty, nobility, various commoners and slaves emerged. Accordingly, the systems of tribal arbitration were submerged into a more unified system of justice which formalized the relation between the different " social classes " rather than "tribes".
The Torah Jewish Lawalso known as the Pentateuch the first five books of the Christian Old Testamentlays down the death penalty for murder, [18] kidnappingcapital punishment essay against, practicing magicviolation of the Sabbathblasphemyand a wide range of sexual crimes, although evidence suggests that actual executions were rare. A further example comes from Ancient Greecewhere the Athenian legal system replacing customary oral law was first written down by Draco in about BC: the death penalty was applied for a particularly wide range of crimes, though Solon later repealed Draco's code and published new laws, retaining capital punishment only for intentional homicideand only with victim's family permission.
The Capital punishment essay against also used the death penalty for a wide range of offences. Protagoras whose thought is reported by Plato criticizes the principle of revenge, because once the damage is done it cannot be canceled by any action. So, if the death penalty is to be imposed by society, it is only to protect the latter against the criminal or for a dissuasive purpose.
In fact, it finds its guarantee capital punishment essay against the death penalty which threatens all those who do not respect it. Platofor his part, saw the death penalty as a means of purification, because crimes are a "defilement". Thus in the Lawshe considered necessary the execution of the animal or the destruction of the object which caused the death of a Man by accident.
For the murderers, he considered that the act of homicide is not natural and is not fully consented by the criminal. Homicide is thus a disease of the soulwhich must be reeducated as much as possible, and, as a last resort, sentence to death if no rehabilitation is possible.
According to Aristotlefor whom free will is proper to man, the citizen is responsible for his acts. If there was a crime, a judge must define the penalty allowing the crime to be annulled by compensating it. This is how pecuniary compensation appeared for criminals the least recalcitrant and whose rehabilitation capital punishment essay against deemed possible.
But for others, the death penalty is capital punishment essay against according to Aristotle. This philosophy aims on the one hand to protect society and on the other hand to compensate in order to cancel the consequences of the crime committed.
It inspired Western criminal law until the 17th centurya time when the first reflections on the abolition of the death penalty appeared. In ancient Romethe application of the death penalty against Roman citizens was unusual and considered exceptional. They preferred alternative sentences ranging, depending on the crime and the criminal, from private or public reprimand to exileincluding the confiscation of his property, or torturecapital punishment essay against, or even prison, and as a last resort, death.
A historic debate, followed by a vote, took place in the Roman Senate to decide the fate of Catiline 's allies when he tried to take power in December then Roman consulargued in favor of the killing of conspirators without judgment by decision of the Senate Senatus consultum ultimum and was followed by the majority of senators; among the minority voices opposed to the execution, we mainly count that of Julius Caesar.
Although many are executed in the People's Republic of China each year in the present day, [29] there was a time in the Tang dynasty — when the death penalty was abolished.
When abolishing the death penalty Xuanzong ordered his officials to refer to the nearest regulation by analogy when sentencing those found guilty of crimes for which the prescribed punishment was execution.
Thus depending on the severity of the crime a punishment of severe scourging with the thick rod or of exile to the remote Lingnan region might take the place of capital punishment.
However, the death penalty was restored only 12 years later in in response to the An Lushan Rebellion. Under Xuanzong capital punishment was relatively infrequent, with only 24 executions in the year and 58 executions in the year The two most common forms of execution in the Tang dynasty were strangulation and decapitation, which were the prescribed methods of execution for and 89 offences respectively, capital punishment essay against.
Strangulation was the prescribed sentence for lodging an accusation against one's parents or grandparents with a magistrate, scheming to kidnap a person and sell them into slavery, capital punishment essay against, and opening a coffin while desecrating a tomb. Decapitation was the method of execution prescribed for more serious crimes such as treason and sedition.
Despite the great discomfort involved, most of the Capital punishment essay against Chinese preferred strangulation to decapitation, as a result of the traditional Tang Chinese belief that the body is capital punishment essay against gift from the parents and capital punishment essay against it is, therefore, capital punishment essay against, disrespectful to one's ancestors to die without returning one's body to the grave intact.
Some further forms of capital punishment were practised in the Tang dynasty, of which the first two that follow at least capital punishment essay against extralegal. The second was truncation, in which the convicted person was cut in two at the waist with a fodder knife and then left to bleed to death.
When a minister of the fifth grade or above received a death sentence the emperor might grant him a special dispensation allowing him capital punishment essay against commit suicide in lieu of execution. Even when this privilege was not granted, the law required that the condemned minister be provided with food and ale by his keepers and transported to the execution ground in a cart rather than having to walk there.
Nearly all executions under the Tang dynasty took place in public as a warning to the population. The heads of the executed were displayed on poles or spears. When local authorities decapitated a convicted criminal, the head was boxed and sent to the capital as proof of identity and that the execution had taken place. In medieval and early modern Europe, before the development of modern prison systems, the death penalty was also used as a generalized form of punishment for even minor offences.
During the reign of King Henry VIII of Englandas many as 72, people are estimated to have been executed in the country. In early modern Europe, a massive moral panic regarding witchcraft swept across Europe and later the European colonies in North America. During this period, there were widespread claims that malevolent Satanic witches were operating as an organized threat to Christendom. As a result, capital punishment essay against, tens of thousands of women were prosecuted for witchcraft and executed through the witch trials of the early modern period between the 15th and 18th centuries, capital punishment essay against.
The death penalty also targeted sexual offences such as sodomy, capital punishment essay against.
Capital punishment essay against England, the Buggery Act stipulated hanging as punishment for " buggery ". James Pratt and John Smith were the last two Englishmen to be executed for sodomy in Despite the wide use of the death penalty, calls for reform were not unknown.
The 12th century Jewish legal capital punishment essay against, Moses Maimonideswrote, "It capital punishment essay against better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent man to death. Maimonides's concern was maintaining popular respect for law, and he saw errors of commission as much more threatening than errors of omission. The Abbasid Caliphs in Baghdadsuch as Al-Mu'tadidwere often cruel in their punishments.
While during the Middle Ages the expiatory aspect of the death penalty was taken into account, this is no longer the case under the Lumières. These define the place of man within society no longer according to a divine rule, capital punishment essay against, but as a contract established at birth between the citizen and the society, it is the social contract.
From that moment on, capital punishment should be seen as useful to society through its dissuasive effect, but also as a means of protection of the latter vis-à-vis criminals. In the last several centuries, with the emergence of modern nation statesjustice came to be increasingly associated with the concept of natural and legal rights.
The period saw an increase in standing police forces and permanent penitential institutions. Rational choice theorya utilitarian approach to criminology which justifies punishment as a form of deterrence as opposed to retribution, can be traced back to Cesare Beccariawhose influential treatise On Crimes and Punishments was the first detailed analysis of capital punishment to demand the abolition of the death penalty.
Official recognition of this phenomenon led to executions being carried out inside prisons, away from public view. In England in the 18th century, when there was no police force, Parliament drastically increased the number of capital offences to more than These were mainly property offences, for example cutting down a cherry tree in an orchard. In Nazi Germany there were three types of capital punishment; hanging, decapitation and death by shooting.
In the past, cowardiceabsence without leave, capital punishment essay against, desertioninsubordinationshirking under enemy fire and disobeying orders were often crimes punishable by death see decimation and running the gauntlet, capital punishment essay against.
One method of execution, since firearms came into common use, has also been firing squadalthough some countries use execution with a single shot to the head or neck. Various authoritarian states—for example those with Fascist or Communist governments—employed the death penalty as a potent means of political oppression. Partly as a response to such excesses, civil rights organizations started to place increasing emphasis on the concept of human rights and an abolition of the death penalty.
By continent, all European states but one have abolished capital capital punishment essay against [note 1] many Oceanian states have abolished it; [note 2] most states in the Americas have abolished its use, [note 3] while a few actively retain it; [note 4] less than half of countries in Africa retain it; [note 5] and the majority of countries in Asia retain it.
IELTS Task 2 Writing. Unit 4. Step 1. The Death Penalty. Consider Both Sides / Opinion Essay.
, time: 10:09Death Penalty | Death Penalty Issues | CIP

Apr 28, · Capital punishment. This article is more than 7 years old. US death row study: 4% of defendants sentenced to die are innocent. This article is more than 7 years old Aug 03, · Capital punishment is biased against the poor. Some Christians argue that in many countries the imposition of the death penalty is biased against The death penalty in America is a broken process from start to finish. Death sentences are predicted not by the heinousness of the crime but by the poor quality of the defense lawyers, the race of the accused or the victim, and the county and state in which the crime occurred. From to , 1, executions occurred in the United States, and of them took place in the South. Time and
No comments:
Post a Comment